Pay The Writer. A Hilarious Rant By Harlan Ellison.
This is a funny video that brings up a serious point. Writer Harlan Ellison goes on an epic rant about the value of creativity. Regardless of your professional accomplishments or status, there will always be people who devalue your creative services. Our reaction as a creative community is what sets the pace. The original youtube thread has a whopping 1046 comments. Surprisingly, not all creatives are not in favor of Harlan. Below is the video of the hilarious rant along with some of the original comments. I’d love to know where you stand on the issue.
basspig
The problem is this new fad of “just good enough”… it’s the fad which the Flip cameras are riding. Graphic design’s heyday was 1980-1992. Video was 1988-2004. Tools became affordable, now everyone’s a ‘designer’/'artist’/'videographer’. And the public can’t seem to tell the difference, plus there are many who work for ‘free’. It’s hard to compete with ‘free’.KANMistry
Replace “writer” with photographer, designer, illustrator, or most other artistic professions, and you have here something that speaks truth on more than just a level for those taking the literary career path.While this guy does tend to go overboard with a couple of his points, he does make some good ones– especially about amateurs (which I am) taking work and pay away from the professionals (which I aim to be), and it’s disheartening how companies simply let that slide.
SoManySkinks
lol, stop bitching about not being able to make a living. When an amateur beats your ability to perform a service, find a new job. It’s exactly the same as when a machine replaces a tradesman. It might suck, yeah, but get used to it. That’s progress for ya.vagrant1
Really want to agree with Ellison and the comments here. Loved his rant & am freelance myself. But the fact is, if the job you do can be so easily done by an amateur – (for free if they like!) companies should be able to use them. I know it sucks, but if no one can tell the difference between pro and amateur why pay for a pro? If they refuse to pay and end up with a pile of shit then it’s their own problem. If what you do can be differentiated from an amateur then you’ve nothing to worry aboutstalepie13
It’s not true that there’s no publicity value. Almost every time I’ve ever bought a Harlan Ellison book or item it was because I was inspired by some free interview he gave. Not making this up.
Twitter credit to @DavidAirey
What’s Your Take?
As a creative, what side of the fence are you on? Is Harlan Ellison being a whiner or is it fair business practice? Chime in.













Tim Patterson
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:09 pm
As a writer – and a Harlan Ellison fan for decades – I tend to agree with most of what he said. However, I suspect that young writers who are new to the game are more willing to trade freebie stuff to get their name out there. Every situation is different. The unknown writer who’s asked to submit a piece that may get him some notoriety may choose to do it for free or at a reduced rate because it can open doors. Harlan is at the stage in his career that he doesn’t need doors opened. In fact, he’s into slamming them shut if he doesn’t need them.
Bottom line: if you can show the market that you have the goods and can create the content, you should eventually be able to demand and get your price. Of course that depends on what the marketplace is willing to pay.
Viola Mcgaugh
December 22nd, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Hi, what blog platform is this? Can I download it for free or..? I would really like it if you could answer this question! Ciao!
Mario
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:04 pm
Tim
You bring up a good point. At this stage in Harlan’s career a free interview is of no value. For a young writer/creative it’s a different story. I think he was offended for getting treated like an amateur. I do think that technology has birthed a lot of hack writers, photographers, designers, and illustrators. If it’s true that the public can’t tell the difference, then who is anyone to complain?
Viola
This site is powered by WordPress.
Carol
January 5th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Mario: Thank you for a having a great blog and so openly sharing your ideas and thoughts. I can really relate to what Harlan says, but it takes awhile to get to the point where you can just say “no.” And I am very glad Harlan did just that… and he should!
I think there are plenty of creative opportunities for all of us in the world if we are passionate and know our niche. I think it all works itself out. As an independent graphic designer I try to differentiate my work through excellent service and always delivering my best high quality work. I have raised my prices incrementally over the last 4 years and have a nice referral base now. I am grateful to be able to say “no” now to contests and requests for lower prices. And I do, emphatically!
Let’s face it, those who work for free or low fees in exchange for exposure are going to continue to do so. (Who knows, I might find one of them with talent to work with me : )
Mario
January 6th, 2010 at 6:51 am
Carol
Thank you for the kind words. I’m glad you enjoy the blog. I think working for less money is a normal when you are starting out. Having said that, do you think he is taking an unfair jab at amateurs?
Carol
January 7th, 2010 at 12:04 am
Yes, a little bit. I wish amateurs would have more of a backbone and charge fees according to their talent/experience. But it takes good business sense and a bit of luck to make a living with your artistry these days. And if you don’t have that business sense, people and corporations will just take advantage. (corporate spec work – that is nasty!!)
In another light, aren’t we in a time when right brain thinking is down right crucial? (ie: the book “A Whole New Mind”). We ought to start seeing a clear shift in the value of “coming up with something from nothing” which is how I define creativity…
website design
January 27th, 2010 at 11:52 am
Harlan is absolutely right. Having been in a situation where a client attempted to get out of paying for things and have things done at “favor” pricing, I can say, first hand, that in business, there are no favors.
I don’t even discount family members for design projects I do; at least, after paying, they’ll retain the right to complain.
Angelique LaCour
December 31st, 2012 at 3:48 pm
I know this is an old thread, but Steven Pressfield posted it on his blog today and I do have to agree with Harlan Ellison (who I’ve never heard of before). In the past it was easy to distinguish between professionals and amateurs (I used to call them hobbyists). It was simple–professionals got paid, and all the rest did it (fill in the blank on any creative art) for some other kind of payoff. Period. It was that simple. But now because of social media and the digital age anybody can get “published” simply by “putting it out there.” Most of it is crap. For me, if you call yourself a writer and have never been paid for what you write, I probably won’t read what you’ve written unless you’re a close friend or family member. Call me a snob, but I just don’t have the time to invest reading a bunch of crap. And if you want to “use” something I’ve written (I do get paid to write), then pay for it, okay?
Richard Watson
January 18th, 2013 at 5:05 am
Ok. So with technology allowing anybody to be creative in certain fields it does not follow that people who have studied or payed their dues to reach the level of making a living from their efforts should be undercut by others who invariably have already got employment in another field. I wonder if the advocates of working for free expect the business’s that supply their daily needs, to give them away for nothing? I do not think so. It seems to be the thinking that if you are a creative you do not need money to survive no matter how long it has taken you to invest in time and study and practice to perfect your art. The plumber, electrician, the mechanic, I could go on, are not expected to work for nothing. Creatives are, in the minds of the majority of people, willing to work for nothing because they so love what they do that they would do it anyway. Yes we all have to deal with changing times but the old adage of ‘The labourer is worthy of his hire’ still stands.
Sonia Taylor
February 20th, 2013 at 12:19 pm
I have a slightly different perspective on this. I am a graphic designer and work in politics for the “progressive” side (which usually doesn’t have much money). When I started doing this political work, the idea was that a “good” environmentalist (fill in the blank with core belief) would work for free, and if they didn’t they weren’t “good.” The result, of course, was that people worked for free, for the good cause, until they burned out and/or needed to actually feed/house/clothe themselves and then they disappeared. Understandably. Constant turn over meant that there never was any continuity to fight the good fight, at great cost to the causes we all believed in. I’ve spent the last 15 years working to change this mind frame. It’s good to charge money for professional services. Fine to charge less for the good cause if you want. But essential to support our friends and allies by hiring them to do the jobs they do professionally.
I was an amateur at one point. I am now an amateur at some of the new things I try. I will do work for free on occasion (never for a corporation). But, ultimately I absolutely support the idea that people should be paid for their work. Period.